01 December 2008

Creepy teen book

Peck, Richard. (1977). Are you in the House Alone? New York: Viking Press. 160 pages.

Gail is a junior in high school and has a steady boyfriend who she is sexually active with. She was smart and proactive and went to Planned Parenthood to get birth control. Everything about Gail is pretty much average. Her looks, her grades, her friends; there is really no reason for anyone to pay much attention to her. Then she starts getting creepy phone calls at night while she's babysitting and receives an extremely violent and sexually explicit letter in her locker at school. Shaken, Gail finds herself with no where to turn and her best friend telling her to "forget it". Finally she makes an attempt at help by going to the guidance councilor at school. Just as she feared she isn't taken seriously. What makes this book both interesting and hard to take at the same time is the ending. Gail is attacked and raped while babysitting by her best friends very rich and boyfriend from a very affluent family. Her family are the only ones who believe her as the police take the side of the boy and his family. This is what irks me, NOTHING HAPPENS. It's implyed that the boy goes crazy and is committed but there are no charges pressed and there is no closure for Gail. She was a sexually active girl in her teens, it must have been her fault. She must have brought it upon herself. So infuriating!

Much along the lines of Judy Blume's Forever, Peck's Are you in the House Alone? is ground breaking for when it was written. Tackling the subject of teen sexuality in a frank and matter-of-fact manner, Peck chose to deal with the darker side and address the topic of rape in a time when women were still "asking for it" if they claimed they were raped. It amazes me that Peck chose to do this and risk incurring the wrath of the feminist movement of the time. I can see where they might have been offended at a man taking such liberties as to try and depict something a man could never experience. I'm just hypothesizing here, I could be totally off base. I think he did a fairly good job all in all.

It would be interesting to have students read this book now. The conversations that you could have with girls (and boys too!) on how this has changed, or not changed, since the book was written and how it makes them feel.

1 comment:

  1. You wrote:

    "Peck chose to deal with the darker side and address the topic of rape in a time when women were still "asking for it" if they claimed they were raped. It amazes me that Peck chose to do this and risk incurring the wrath of the feminist movement of the time."

    Interesting. Do you think that the fact that such a story was written by a man would have incurred the wrath of the movement? I've always thought that (co-optation of voice aside) this was a pretty feminist novel and a very timely one (considering when it was published) as well.

    Amy P.

    ReplyDelete